R.I.P. Scout26
RP for Veep?
And how did we all reach this conclusion?
. . .Romney is not to the magic number of delegates yet, but he's darn close.
I have the feeling that the endorsement is just what's expected of a politician who hopes to have the support of the party establishment for seniority, choice committee appointments, etc. in the future. Ya know, be a team player, etc.
According to The Wall Street Journal on June 6, Romney had 1,398 delgates . . . 1,144 are needed to seal the nomination. http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/06/06/romney-delegate-tally-now-at-1398/
They're lying. Romney is right at 1100 now (he had less than that on June 6.) Paul has about 240.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.
I hope we all understand Rand will not be the party nominee in 2016. Or 2020.
Politicians and bureaucrats are considered productive if they swarm the populace like a plague of locust, devouring all substance in their path and leaving a swath of destruction like a firestorm. The technical term is "bipartisanship".
Bob: how are you arriving at that number? Not counting straw poll states that went Romney but don't officially award delegates til the convention?
I doubt he'll ever be a serious contender ......
I doubt the Republicans will ever be a serious contender if they keep putting up guys like Romney....
Is that why the demos are running around in circles like headless chickens in fear the Annionted One will lose to Romney in November? ? ? ? ? ?
The Big O is doing so bad he would likely lose to anyone this time around. Hopefully, that trend doesn't change.
Let's not make the mistake of thinking people vote for him according to what he is doing instead of according to what he represents. DD