So it's interesting to follow this "anarchist warlord" thing in Seattle. While I find the name given to the guy amusing, I of course recognize he's not calling himself that. In in some ways, this is not much different than what the Bundys did in Oregon.
I recall the MSM, many national politicians, and the left (but I repeat myself) calling for everything from military intervention to just wiping out that group of "domestic terrorists", who, if I recall, destroyed nothing while being a thorn in the gov's side. How those same people have changed to supporting a takeover of not a remote facility, but the middle of a large city, is almost amusing, especially considering the accompanying destruction.
Other than in the Bundy incident, a protestor was killed by police and everything was cool - the left (and many on the right) said he deserved it. I'm thinking the MSM might cover it a bit differently if a protestor in this Seattle "zone" is killed in the same way.