So, to be clear, you're okay with certain liberties being restricted as long as it is either a state or local government doing it, and not the Feds? Interesting indeed, thanks for sharing. :)
I assume this also means you're okay with states such as MA, CA, NY, etc., restricting firearms ownership, so long as it's done on a local or state level?
Though I disagree with your opinion on matters like that, I applaud you for not only sticking to your guns (pun!) but taking a moment to answer my question.
EDIT: D'oh, I don't know how I skimmed over it. You specifically mention that laws should be made locally but within the framework of the Constitution. My mistake, no offense intended due to my overlooking that. :)