Author Topic: Study: Male Viewers Find Sexy News Anchors Distracting (Read 6653 times)

MechAg94 · « **on:** January 27, 2011, 04:24:16 PM »

http://www.aolnews.com/2011/01/26/study-male-viewers-find-sexy-news-anchors-distracting/

Quote

Rabe and her colleague Leila Samson wanted to see how sexy anchors affect men's ability to retain the actual news, so they devised an experiment in which they asked hundreds of them to watch the same 24-year-old anchor deliver a broadcast twice -- once dressed in modest attire and another time in something more revealing, complete with jewelry, makeup and cleavage.

The study, published online in the journal Communication Research, found that men were more likely to closely watch the sexy anchors but less likely to remember what they said. So networks that hire attractive news anchors may get higher ratings but have less-informed male viewers as a result.

I am certainly glad this study was done. Otherwise I would never have known why I get nothing out of watching the news. Here I thought it was just that the news reported nothing worth hearing. Now I know it was that the news anchor lady was just too good looking and well dressed. It is all my fault. Of course, it is a primal and instinctive response so I am clearly not to blame for my "condition".

They need to start a new 24 hour news network that is dedicated to having no well dressed or good looking anchors to make sure the real news is communicated effectively. I'm sure the ratings will be great since everyone really wants to hear the news and know what is going on in the world (according to the news reporters).

http://www.click2houston.com/bumpertobumperblog/index.html
http://www.click2houston.com/slideshow/slideshows/24396495/detail.html

Gowen · « **Reply #1 on:** January 27, 2011, 04:41:54 PM »

.....um.. I don't know what she said, but I liked both stories.....

Harold Tuttle · « **Reply #2 on:** January 27, 2011, 04:47:29 PM »

http://www.nakednews.com/

The only program of its kind in the world that is real news, sports, entertainment and infotainment programs delivered by a roster of all-nude, attractive & intelligent women

MillCreek · « **Reply #3 on:** January 27, 2011, 04:48:40 PM »

In the name of science, this study should be repeated to measure the effect, if any, on female viewers.

BlueStarLizzard · « **Reply #4 on:** January 27, 2011, 05:20:39 PM »

Why make studies on crap we already know?

And the fact that it was women asking the question....

charby · « **Reply #5 on:** January 27, 2011, 05:29:06 PM »

Don't take away my joy of the morning, Gretchen Carlson.

Monkeyleg · « **Reply #6 on:** January 27, 2011, 06:04:03 PM »

Please tell me that no money was spent on answering a question that could have been easily and conclusively answered by just about any guy 16 years or older.

gunsmith · « **Reply #7 on:** January 27, 2011, 06:08:12 PM »

that's why they call it "Fox news"

French G. · « **Reply #8 on:** January 27, 2011, 10:19:00 PM »

My dad gets irritated because he resents the manipulation of getting us to stare instead of listen. Anyway, he's old.

Gretchen Carlson not bad but still no E.D. Hill in knee high boots. Can't remember the chick they had on Fox News new year's coverage but she had the whole store front on display.

Bob F. · « **Reply #9 on:** January 27, 2011, 10:32:55 PM »

I watch Robin Meade on HLN, AKA: "Happy Land News". I guess she does the stories in English; I never turn the sound on.

Zardozimo Oprah Bannedalas · « **Reply #10 on:** January 27, 2011, 11:34:23 PM »

Quote from: bluestarlizzard on January 27, 2011, 05:20:39 PM

Why make studies on crap we already know?

And the fact that it was women asking the question....

They just want to make sure.

French G. · « **Reply #11 on:** January 28, 2011, 12:50:04 AM »

Quote from: Bob F. on January 27, 2011, 10:32:55 PM

I watch Robin Meade on HLN, AKA: "Happy Land News". I guess she does the stories in English; I never turn the sound on.

That's pretty much what FNC needs to do is get Robin Meade and Betty Nguyen to defect, CNN would implode.

tyme · « **Reply #12 on:** January 28, 2011, 03:38:39 AM »

I agree that the news is distracting.

MechAg94 · « **Reply #13 on:** January 28, 2011, 08:37:50 AM »

Maybe they should have done the study to determine how sensational the news has to be to distract men from admiring attractive women? It seems that it doesn't, but they need to make sure.

charby · « **Reply #14 on:** January 28, 2011, 08:38:13 AM »

Quote from: French G. on January 27, 2011, 10:19:00 PM

My dad gets irritated because he resents the manipulation of getting us to stare instead of listen. Anyway, he's old. Gretchen Carlson not bad but still no E.D. Hill in knee high boots. Can't remember the chick they had on Fox News new year's coverage but she had the whole store front on display.

Gretchen is easy on my eyes for me because she is pretty but not too pretty. She has the girl next door appeal for me.

bedlamite · « **Reply #15 on:** January 28, 2011, 08:53:14 AM »

We're almost there ...

HankB · « **Reply #16 on:** January 28, 2011, 09:07:00 AM »

Maybe some network will read this study, decide NEWS is actually important, and hire Helen Thomas to read it.

Doggy Daddy · « **Reply #17 on:** January 28, 2011, 09:15:05 AM »

Gotta put a good word in here for s. e. cupp.

DD

MechAg94 · « **Reply #18 on:** January 28, 2011, 10:22:14 AM »

Quote from: Doggy Daddy on January 28, 2011, 09:15:05 AM

Gotta put a good word in here for s. e. cupp.

DD

That could be taken the wrong way.

Do we have an "in the gutter" emoticon?

CNYCacher · « **Reply #19 on:** January 28, 2011, 12:41:19 PM »

vaskidmark · « **Reply #20 on:** January 28, 2011, 02:24:30 PM »

Quote from: CNYCacher on January 28, 2011, 12:41:19 PM

http://www.google.com/images?q=MÃ©lissa+Theuriau

*LÃ© sigh*

With an oboe!

hubba-hubba!

stay safe.

charby · « **Reply #21 on:** January 28, 2011, 02:29:33 PM »

Quote from: CNYCacher on January 28, 2011, 12:41:19 PM

http://www.google.com/images?q=MÃ©lissa+Theuriau

*LÃ© sigh*

its the acai berry lady

TechMan · « **Reply #22 on:** January 28, 2011, 03:02:19 PM »

Quote

found that men were more likely to closely watch the sexy anchors but less likely to remember what they said. So networks that hire attractive news anchors may get higher ratings but have less-informed male viewers as a result.

I am thinking of a phrase:

No *expletive deleted* Sherlock!!!

CNYCacher · « **Reply #23 on:** January 28, 2011, 03:07:09 PM »

Quote from: charby on January 28, 2011, 02:29:33 PM

its the acai berry lady

Her image has been stolen by the people who do these ads.

Tallpine · « **Reply #24 on:** January 28, 2011, 05:10:42 PM »

And now, for the breast of the story ...

News:

Author Topic: Study: Male Viewers Find Sexy News Anchors Distracting (Read 6653 times)