No argument there! But the gun sells well so they must be doing something right. Didn't S&W come out with their own version recently? I never put a whole lot of thought into the Judge because I am pretty sure it isn't legal here in CA.
First- Note that my rage is directed at those who buy and recommend a Taurus Judge or similar for SD/HD. I don't care if you brought it to shoot snakes or whatever. If you carry it for SD and/or recommend it to others for the same...well, you are a dumbass.
The only thing they are doing right is marketing (and they are doing a hell of a job at it)...S&W jumped on the bandwagon to make the money from idjits with a more...discriminating taste in junk. Yes, I did a facepalm when learning that S&W decided to bring out the "Governor"
1. Actually, I did multiple facepalms.
And, yes, I call people who not only choose a Judge for SD, but RECOMMEND IT TO OTHERS FOR SD based on their "vast" experience shooting dirt clods and watermelons at the range with it *expletive deleted*ing idiots because they are. Giving idiotic advice that may very well get someone killed in an SD scenario is criminally stoopid, IMHO. This very much so includes Taurus (and now S&W) for marketing it as a defensive weapon in the first place, and the gunrags such as the NRA mags for praising it.
Buy a real defensive grade gun if you want a SD gun. Feel free to buy a Judge for shooting dirt clods and watermelons, I don't care. Just don't recommend it as an SD weapon unless you like being known as a mouthbreathing jackwagon.
Honestly, if you've ever listened to the idiots at the guncounter clamoring for the Judge...you'd understand why it and it's acolytes are so hated...
1Actually, my exact words were "What the F***ing HELL S&W?! Do you hire designers who ride the short bus to work? Thought you were making a turnaround with stuff like the M&P pistols and rifles and ditching locks on some models...but now you're snatching defeat from the jaws of victory."