So I'm trying to figure out what's behind the whole vote recount thing, ostensibly led by Jill Stein. She has apparently collected more money for it than she received for her entire presidential campaign. Some random thoughts:
So the electronic voting machines that were 100% reliable and tamper-proof when Trump mentioned potential voter fraud are now rife with hackerware?
I believe it is Wisconsin where Stein's people are saying that Trump won by the 'incredibly slim" margin of 50,000 votes. If that's "incredibly slim", then I'd assume Trump's people could call it "slim" if miraculously (or by sleight of hand) the votes flipped to +50,000 for Hillary. They would have to find at least 50,000 "fraudulent" Trump votes, then if they're calling 50K slim, they'd better come up with an additional 20K or so votes for Clinton, or they just have the same "unreliable" vote count as Trump currently does. They would have to do the same for the other contended states.
At the risk of donning tinfoil, I'd heard that Soros is actually behind this and using Stein as a patsy, and that Clinton may be in on it as well, which is why she's laying low on the subject. Normally I'd label myself as a conspiracy theorist for thinking that, but these days and with those people, I'm not so sure.
Lastly, can these people give it a rest already? I think even some mainstream dems are beginning to get tired of it all.