The missing piece here is that the hospital (by most medical accounts including the parents expert) didn't want the baby to suffer agonising pain during a move for a most likely fruitless treatment. That is a reasonable position unless you think parents have an absolute right to make decisions to the point of agonising pain for their children.
Again, this was not a case about refusing treatment because it was fruitless. It was a case about refusing to move the child and thereby causing risk of great suffering to the point of death.
To paraphrase:
Blah blah blah, bullshit, blah blah blah, socialism is good, blah blah, America sucks, blah blah blah.
Bullshit, you are still trying to justify the socialist paradise refusing to allow potential life saving treatment of a child.