Thanks to
The Firing Line, I found the actual document for
Young:
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2022/08/19/12-17808.pdfYoung is a case out of Hawaii that challenges Hawaii's "may issue" [but generally won't] carry permitting system. Since it is a law similar to the New York "may issue" law that was recently struck down by the Supreme Court,
Young had been on hold pending a decision in the
NYSRPA v. Bruen case. In the wake of Bruen, the SCOTUS bounced the case back down to the Nirth Circuit to be reevaluated using the criteria established by
NYSRPA.
Apparently rather than decide the case themselves on that basis, the Ninth Circuit decided to kick the can back to the district court to be re-decided -- using the criteria established under
NYSRPA. Whether this is a delaying tactic or good jurisprudence depends, I suppose, on one's perspective.