“Law” is Not Determinative of Conduct

[Tuco]

The one caused the other via the hateful bigoted mentalities of the members holding that fallacious position.

Hey now.  Stand down.

[Bosco1]

None are determinative of behavior though.

Causation is a notion we men ascribe to a state of affairs after the fact, when, in fact, no human act is causally produced from any ensemble of facts in the world, from the world outside of human consciousness.

[Bosco1]

Hey now.  Stand down.

Oh, I see now, that picture appearing on your page is of Tuko from The Good the Bad and the Ugly! I thought is was of you!

[RoadKingLarry]

Causation is a notion we men ascribe to a state of affairs after the fact, when, in fact, no human act is causally produced from any ensemble of facts in the world, from the world outside of human consciousness.

My dog ate a pile of Scrabble tiles the other day, his poop makes more sense than that statement.
 

[WLJ]

My dog ate a pile of Scrabble tiles the other day, his poop makes more sense than that statement.
 

And smelled better.

[cordex]

My dog ate a pile of Scrabble tiles the other day, his poop makes more sense than that statement.
 

It means that nothing anyone says causes his reactions and that he alone is responsible for every word he writes and action he takes.

[Bosco1]

My dog ate a pile of Scrabble tiles the other day, his poop makes more sense than that statement.
 

See, now, that statement is horridly hateful and radically rude/stupid. I am coming from a Sartreian perspective on the origin of human action, and, you have no knowledge whatsoever of the structure of that perspective...nonetheless, you insist on being mean and stupid about it!

[Bosco1]

It means that nothing anyone says causes his reactions and that he alone is responsible for every word he writes and action he takes.

What someone else said is not causally efficient to do or produce anything, my consciousness of the insult produced my responce/reaction. I thought I was slowly getting that through your thick head, but apparently not...

[WLJ]

Effect without cause
Cause without effect.

[Bosco1]

Effect without cause
Cause without effect.

Human freedom, known as being-for-itself, is not causally determined to act or refrain from acting by anything outside in the world. The things in the world are being-in-itself, and are not for-itselfs/consciousnesses, and do not, cannot, act in the world.

[230RN]

https://armedpolitesociety.com/index.php?topic=67924.msg1387291#msg1387291

^  Like.

I wonder what fuels his fire to generate all that hot air?

[WLJ]

It means that nothing anyone says causes his reactions and that he alone is responsible for every word he writes and action he takes

In other words he says he's ignoring what you say
But then reacts to it while claiming he's not 

[cordex]

What someone else said is not causally efficient to do or produce anything, my consciousness of the insult produced my responce/reaction. I thought I was slowly getting that through your thick head, but apparently not...

I don’t think you’ve said anything that has gotten through my thick head.

[Bosco1]

https://armedpolitesociety.com/index.php?topic=67924.msg1387291#msg1387291

^  Like.

I wonder what fuels his fire to generate all that hot air?

I am simply radically higher educated than you are, and, you are so totally uneducated rergarding modern notions of the origin of human behavior, that your brain simply does what it is, i.e,, exhibits total lack of twentieth century efficient cognizance of how a human act actually arises in the world. Chump.

[WLJ]

I am simply radically higher educated than you are, and, you are so totally uneducated rergarding modern notions of the origin of human behavior, that your brain simply does what it is, i.e,, exhibits total lack of twentieth century efficient cognizance of how a human act actually arises in the world. Chump.

This is comedy gold!
Not often we see a master troll at work

 

[WLJ]

BTW: It's now the 21st Century Chump

[230RN]

Bosco1 said,

What someone else said is not causally efficient to do or produce anything, my consciousness of the insult produced my responce/reaction.

But passion or serendipity is interdependant on the relatedness of motivation, subcultures, and management.

Can't you see that?

Terry, 230RN

[Bosco1]

I don’t think you’ve said anything that has gotten through my thick head.

Ah-ha, you are not being objective here, but, simply entertain some irrational blind prejudice against the structure of my personal person!

[Bosco1]

BTW: It's now the 21st Century Chump

Yes, I know, but my education was in the twentieth century...

[cordex]

Ah-ha, you are not being objective here, but, simply entertain some irrational blind prejudice against the structure of my personal person!

No, I’m just too thick headed and stuck in the 16th century.

[WLJ]

Okay, enough with this trolling act. Who are you really?   

[Ben]

My mentality, uncontrollable and wanton as always, whispered to me a scheme so magnificent and daring that I shrank from the very thought of what I was hearing. "Stop!" I cried imploringly to my god-like mind. "This is madness." But still I listened to the counsel of my brain. It was offering me the opportunity to Save the World

[Bosco1]

In other words he says he's ignoring what you say
But then reacts to it while claiming he's not 

How can I possibly be ignoring what was said, and, at the same time respond thereto !? Silly.

[Bosco1]

Okay, enough with this trolling act. Who are you really?   

Oh oh,, here we go with the accusatory bullcrap! Trolling!? But of course ---- you

[WLJ]

Come on drop the act