So that's a no?we both believe he had a gun?
Do we both believe it behooves one to be careful when armed during a traffic stop?&*
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
You should be careful. At the same time, making a small mistake in choreography of your movements should not be a death sentence.
Every single state, including the very anti-gun ones, has some form of legal carry now. Mere possession of a gun is not a valid reason for a police officer to kill someone.
Hence it behooves one to be very careful. One never knows when one matches the description of someone who is wanted.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
If you can tell me how I can know when I match the description of someone wanted, I'd love to hear it.
The fellow did not have a CCW. He was pulled because he fit the exact description of a recent armed robber. Of course, when you are agenda driven, facts mean nothing.
He did have a permit. Minnesota has 87 counties, you can apply for a permit at any county sheriff. One sheriff saying he didn't apply there means absolutely nothing. A poster on a police forum said he had a permit issued in Hennepin county.
Unless you have access to MN police databases you have absolutely no way to confirm he had no permit.
The robbery took place the day before. "exact description" was vague enough to cover 3/4 of black male population of the state.
Of course, when you are agenda driven, facts mean nothing.
I'm not seeing much "The gun! The gun!" from the left.
I have seen people literally saying "gun laws are killing black people"