And shootinstudent is right on time to defend their beloved terrorist front group CAIR.
It's not even a MAYBE anymore. The whole freaking justice department knows! The ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, the ties to Hamas, they're all fact! Give it up!
Oh yes-the same Justice Department that runs the ATF, whose accusations cannot be trusted, absolutely must be believed if it claims terrorism.
Right?
The irony is spine-breaking. You hit all three of the very same things that you started out lambasting when applied to gun owners-
1. Stereotype-wrong when people stereotype certain guns as "assault weapons" and therefore dangerous. But perfectly okay to let stereotypes run wild if it's about CAIR/Muslims.
2. Media reporting-absolutely wrong, doesn't even get the names right, when it comes to reporting gun seizures and ATF assaults. But must be accepted without question if it reports something bad about Muslims.
3. Justice department allegations-totally blown out of proportion and to be distrusted if levied against Cavalry arms or other victims of the ATF/DOJ.....but if the DOJ alleges something about CAIR (which it didn't really-but hey, we're accepting any media report as true for Muslims right?), it must be a fact, because "the whole freaking justice department knows!"...unlike with gun crime, where apparently the infallible knowledge of the DOJ becomes suspect.
I really want to know, Manedwolf-how do you do it? Contradictions like this would drive me nuts...what is it that lets you look with so much skepticism at media and government allegations when guns are on the table, but that makes you into a yes-man when the subject happens to be Muslim?
Is it just that you need for the DOJ to accuse Muslims of gun crime for you to take a hard look at the accusations, but any other kind of allegation is true? Or what?