As to what taxes are you willing to hire other people to kill people for, the answer is all of them. If I have no problem hiring other people to conduct drone strikes and kill innocent civilians who just happen to be in proximity to a wanted target, or to pay G98 to fly around in a BUFF all those years training for a nuclear drop on the Soviet Union, what does some isolated tax protestor amount to?
False parallel is false. You can't draw a parallel between warfare theater operations and tax enforcement. Warfare theaters exist outside the scope of the political process inside a nation's borders. Ostensibly, if US foreign policy is 100% perfect, all US warfare theaters are defensive and just. Tax enforcement exists inside the scope of a nation's political process. A tax protestor isn't trying to nuke you, bomb your city, or shoot you with a rifle. He's trying to keep what is his own property, as his own property. The tax protestor is rejecting your assertion of ownership over his property and life. Any attack on a tax protestor is by definition an offensive action by those enforcing the tax law, and response by the tax protestor is by definition a defensive action.
Embrace that, and really roll it around in your head for awhile, Millcreek.
Then ask yourself, how are you any different from the Free *expletive deleted*it
TM Army? You're getting Free *expletive deleted*it
TM, taking it by compulsion from others. Free safety nets that you think are acceptable reasons to take money at threat of violence from other people. Free, free, free. Yay, free.
The only difference between your stance and an Obamaphone/Obamastash Detroit inner city morlock, is the degree of legitimized theft at State-sponsored gunpoint that you believe in.
Maybe we need to change the national anthem.
Land of the Free *expletive deleted*it.
Home of the Brave face-shooters.