The hypocrisy of the drunk rape thing is that the guys are usually drunk, and making bad decisions themselves.
Doesn't matter. Still his fault. ALWAYS his fault, NEVER hers.
There's a case making the rounds now about a guy who got blackout drunk, exerted no force against anyone; a woman OF HER OWN ACCORD decided to perform oral on him while he was thus incapacitated.
The school expelled HIM - there was a sexual assault, he was involved, and was the one who was drunk. Because his judgment was impaired, he's automatically at fault under the school's policies. For being raped.
Another case which may be settled now, both parties were drunk out of their minds, according to all witnesses. Both parties physically and verbally consented to sex, of their own free will with no coercion - again, according to all witnesses including the roommate who was pissed they were being so loud. She changed her mind over the next week IIRC, charged him with rape. Police investigation took two months, turned up no evidence of rape, and closed the case. So she took it to the school, and got him expelled. She got not so much as a slap on the wrist, he got screwed over by a woman who suffered from buyer's remorse and wanted to make it not have happened, retroactively. And thanks to Title IX, she gets to do just that, with the school's wholehearted support, regardless of the fact that evidently, no crime actually took place that night.
In both cases, the male victim is (or has been) in the process of suing the school for violation of his civil rights, as well as breach of contract, etc.