So what I take away from it is:
-less pistachios and almonds. OK, fine.
-those farms are under water, so they will not be consuming water from the Colorado River.
-the land under these farms has subsided nearly 30 feet due to drinking out the aquifers. One might hope that a good bit of this flood water will recharge the aquifers in the region.
-there will be considerable silt migration. In some ways a fast moving flood could strip top soil away and ruin farmland, but silt deposit could also reinvigorate farmland.
Seems to me California is missing a huge opportunity here. It's time to re-establish Tulare lake. Turn it into a reservoir and be a good custodian of its drainage and capacities. If Tulare lake used to be the largest fresh water body west of the Mississippi and existed naturally, what numb *expletive deleted*ck decided to drain it, then turn it into farmland, and irrigate it from a sandstone riverbed 200 miles away (Lakes Mead and Havasu and the Colorado River)?