I did say I wanted to say. Now I will expound. Neither side of the uniparty is interested in fiscal responsibility. Asserting one side is responsible for inflation is false in two ways: first it perpetuates the illusion of the two party system, and second it obfuscates the systemic origins of our monetary problems.
So why do you have a problem with my correcting your empirically wrong, political, propaganda-like, drive-by post? Why did you need to make it personal?
You are lying about what I said. Why?
Let's see if you can spot the difference between these two statements.
Statement 1: "There is every reason to believe political leaders X, Y, and Z would have done a better job dealing with issue B."
Statement 2: "Political leaders X, Y, and Z have a perfect record on B, and only leaders H, J, and Q are responsible for B."
Statement 1 is a paraphrase of what I said. Why do you want to accuse me of saying 2?