That's how I view it.
I am not at all happy that Baldwin gets to walk, but I blame the prosecution. If they were so sure this ammunition -- whatever it was and wherever it came from -- had no evidentiary value, then it wouldn't have hurt their case to inform the defense about it. The fact that they hid it certainly suggests that it DID have evidentiary value. Why else would they hide it?
A possibiity: because The Fix Was In and they wanted to provide an excuse for a later mistrial or even a dismissal... which happened. Just another branch on this weed.
I HATE prosecutors who skirt the rules in the blind pursuit of a conviction. I think there was enough to easily convict Baldwin. To have the case dismissed over something like this in inexcusable.
Agreed, but see above "possibility" remark.
Quoted for truth.
In a true and just world every person on the prosecution team who played fast and loose with the evidentiary rules and issues would be looking for a non-legal job on Monday morning.
bob
In that true and just and fair and equitable world, they'd be looking at their cell doors slamming shut on Monday morning. And if The Fix isn't any wider, one would hope the new DA would be willing to go after the old DA.
Terry, 230RN